Since the initial burst of growth in the online Mens Movement (circa 2000), the question of what we wish to accomplish, and how we should go about it, has dominated much of the internal political discourse. The topic has swirled around in the background now for well over a decade with no resolution in sight.
Until now, this has been one of our strengths as a movement. The Mens Movement is about as 'grass roots', as 'anarchistic' of a movement as I can imagine. Literally, no 'official' leadership with adoption of ideas based simply on debate and general acceptance of the 'membership'.
The problem is, this hyper-democratic approach does not work once we have attracted the attention of those who would twist the movement to their own ends, and have the resources to become a majority of posters on whichever discussion board they wish. It can hardly be argued that the movement isn't daily assailed by 'tone police' and trolls, as well as those genuinely trying to argue our movement is unnecessary.
As well, there has been 'adoptions' of relatively new, nebulous, vaguely positive sounding goals attributed to the Mens Movement that are wholly a product of the latest influx of neophytes. This is born of generalized ignorance of mens issues, utter lack of understanding of human nature, and unrealistic approaches that are frankly characteristic of newby anythings. I have no doubt at all, though, that a good portion of these newcomers are false flag MRAs pretending 'agreement' while taking for granted, for instance, that Patriarchy Theory has merit, and arguing for 'smashing male Gender Roles' (this is different from Feminism how exactly?) is 'what the MRM is about'.
I will leave to another time the subject of the actual goals of the MRM, although I will share my own beliefs on what some of them are (or were). What I want to address here is The Way Forward.
Until now, this has been one of our strengths as a movement. The Mens Movement is about as 'grass roots', as 'anarchistic' of a movement as I can imagine. Literally, no 'official' leadership with adoption of ideas based simply on debate and general acceptance of the 'membership'.
The problem is, this hyper-democratic approach does not work once we have attracted the attention of those who would twist the movement to their own ends, and have the resources to become a majority of posters on whichever discussion board they wish. It can hardly be argued that the movement isn't daily assailed by 'tone police' and trolls, as well as those genuinely trying to argue our movement is unnecessary.
As well, there has been 'adoptions' of relatively new, nebulous, vaguely positive sounding goals attributed to the Mens Movement that are wholly a product of the latest influx of neophytes. This is born of generalized ignorance of mens issues, utter lack of understanding of human nature, and unrealistic approaches that are frankly characteristic of newby anythings. I have no doubt at all, though, that a good portion of these newcomers are false flag MRAs pretending 'agreement' while taking for granted, for instance, that Patriarchy Theory has merit, and arguing for 'smashing male Gender Roles' (this is different from Feminism how exactly?) is 'what the MRM is about'.
I will leave to another time the subject of the actual goals of the MRM, although I will share my own beliefs on what some of them are (or were). What I want to address here is The Way Forward.
