A Confession.

I have a confession to make.  I'm a Socialist.

That might surprise the Hell out of a lot of MRAs to hear, and it'll definitely surprise, say, the mods at reddit/mensrights to hear it, but I am.

I am horrified, for example, at the idea of not getting medical care because you can't afford it.  That's just plain stupid.  So is losing everything you own because you had a heart attack.

I believe there are certain things, like electricity, or water, that should be delivered by public utilities, not a for-profit corporation, and that Unions serve a useful purpose, even today in an age where most unions have themselves seemingly forgotten what they are for.

Forced Fatherhood: a response.

I never go there unless linked for a reason, and this time, I feel the need to respond.  Amanda Marcotte, writing over at Pandagon, writes out a list or 'requirements' for Feminist support for male reproductive rights.

Somehow, I managed to hold back my grateful relief that Feminists will allow 'would-be Deadbeat Dads' (as opposed to Pro Choice, or Pro Adoption, women) to finally lay claim to rights equal to those of women:

• He has to sign away all rights before the baby is born.  He does not get his name on the birth certificate. The child’s father will be registered as “unknown”. If someone else—say his ex’s new husband—wishes to adopt and coparent the child, he cannot interfere.

Sure, I can get behind that.

• The only exception to this is if the mother did not alert the father to the pregnancy beforehand. He should be able to provide witnesses to testify that he hadn’t seen her in at least six months prior to the birth.

Some kind of time limit, preferably equal to that amount of time to decide that women would have, sure.  This seems reasonable enough.

• He never contacts the child. As far as his child knows, he’s a ghost. No visits, no toys, no pictures, nothing. He should also not be allowed to contact the mother. If he reaches out to the mother, she has full rights to sue him for child support, using that as evidence that he actually does want a relationship with his ex and his biological child.

Agreed.  You can't unmake the decision to adopt out...oh, wait, you can.  Well, I can agree to this anyway.

• This is for life. If you contact the child on her 18th birthday, you owe 18 years of back child support. If you contact the child when she’s 30, same thing: All 18 years of child support, with interest.

 Nope.  Can't see why this should be in place.  What if the contact is accidental?  What if it is for legitimate, or emergency purposes?   Not to mention this treats Child Support as a punishment (which it surely is, but is almost never presented that way).  I CAN agree if said contact is in order to establish a relationship, but only if the exact same requirements are laid on parents who contact their post-adoption children later.  See, it's not about punishing men for having sex Amanda, no matter how much you want to.

Long post about music and the Mens Movement.

I must have a lot more Sociologist in me than I'm willing to admit.  Perhaps that's a side effect of the Red Pill, since so many people complain of not being able to 'unsee' things.  One area where this stuff hits me the most, for some odd reason, is music.

I've always been a huge audiophile, and have a very wide taste in music, from Brooks and Dunn to Velvet Acid Christ.  What ties a lot of the music I like together isn't the genre, but the purity of the message.  Not 'purity' in the Christian sense, but pure in it's direction.  The honesty of the song.

One of my all time favorite 'albums' is the mashup between Jay Z and Linkin Park.  For the record, I don't own a CD, or even an MP3, of either of these bands on their own.  But this mashup resonates with me.  A lot of guys I've talked to say the same thing, they all own it, and they all agree it's a fantastic compilation.